<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Microsoft Defender for Cloud on Yogesh Thanvi</title>
    <link>https://yogeshthanvi.com/tags/microsoft-defender-for-cloud/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Microsoft Defender for Cloud on Yogesh Thanvi</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://yogeshthanvi.com/tags/microsoft-defender-for-cloud/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>From ITAF to Azure Controls: Operationalizing an IT Audit Framework on Microsoft Cloud</title>
      <link>https://yogeshthanvi.com/posts/from-itaf-to-azure-controls/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yogeshthanvi.com/posts/from-itaf-to-azure-controls/</guid>
      <description>An audit framework tells you what to assure. It does not tell you how to enforce it in a live cloud. Here is how I map the IT Audit Framework onto concrete Azure controls, Azure Policy, Defender for Cloud, and Purview, so assurance objectives become running enforcement instead of a spreadsheet.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mapping CSPM to Microsoft Defender for Cloud: From Findings to Enforcement</title>
      <link>https://yogeshthanvi.com/posts/cspm-to-defender-for-cloud/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://yogeshthanvi.com/posts/cspm-to-defender-for-cloud/</guid>
      <description>Defender for Cloud is excellent at telling you what is misconfigured. A finding is not a fix. Here is how I turn cloud security posture management on Azure from a dashboard of alerts into enforcement that blocks and remediates, using Azure Policy deny effects and admission-time control on AKS.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
